653 research outputs found

    The vanishing art of doing

    Get PDF

    Receiving Bad News: A Thematic Analysis of Stroke Survivor Experiences.

    Full text link
    Background: Breaking bad news to patients may be required in service provision to stroke survivors. While challenging, it may be critical to the retention of optimism and participation in rehabilitation. Objectives: To explore the experience of stroke survivors when receiving bad news (RBN) from medical practitioners. Methods: Data were obtained via 1:1 interviews conducted at stroke support groups with survivors at least 12 months into recovery and subsequently transcribed for thematic analysis and coded using NVivo. Results: Eight of 10 participants experienced RBN, and 2 participants did not. The themes of being "lucky to be alive" and waiting for "delayed information" were expressed by all participants early in the interviews. Three sub-themes emerged and were labelled alliance, dissent, and dissatisfaction, each with a further 3 contextual themes. The perception of RBN was marked amongst the dissent and dissatisfaction groups, with the latter reporting negative implications for their rehabilitation as well as negative emotions, such as anger and anxiety. The perception of a poor-quality relationship with medical practitioners was said to impede rehabilitation and recovery processes. The dissent group was characterized by initial disbelief after RBN and consequently poorer long-term outcomes, whilst the Alliance group experienced very good quality of care due to existing personal knowledge and therefore did not perceive RBN during their early medical meetings. Conclusions: In the period soon after their stroke, survivors required their medical practitioners to not only communicate knowledge and information, but also needed validation of their hopes and fears for the future from an empathically attuned clinician

    The Behavioural Outcomes of Anxiety scale (BOA): A preliminary validation in stroke survivors

    Full text link
    © 2014 The British Psychological Society. Objectives To determine the psychometric properties of an observational scale of anxiety.Design A cross-sectional and longitudinal survey with stroke survivor-carer dyads.Methods Eighty-nine dyads recruited in community stroke groups completed: a demographic questionnaire; the Behavioural Outcomes of Anxiety scale (BOA), survivor-rated (survivor BOA) and carer-rated (carer BOA) versions; the anxiety scale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS-A), also in carer and survivor versions. Twenty-seven survivors and carers repeated the BOA after 1 week.Results Correlations between the carer BOA and the survivor HADS-A (r =.55, p <.001) and the survivor BOA (r =.73, p <.001) demonstrated construct validity. Cronbach's alpha for the carer BOA was.81; item statistics did not identify any items for exclusion. The test-retest coefficient at 1 week was 0.83. Receiver operating characteristic analysis against the survivor HADS-A and BOA produced areas under the curve of 0.75 and 0.88, respectively. At a cut-off score of 13/14 sensitivity and specificity against the HADS-A were 0.77 and 0.58, respectively, and 0.86 and 0.68 against the survivor BOA. The impact of stroke on memory was associated with elevated anxiety. Scores for both BOA versions were independent of demographic variables.Conclusions The carer BOA has acceptable psychometric properties and is independent of survivor demographic variables such as age. It identifies self-reported cases with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. It has potential for use with persons unable to self-report anxiety. Further validation is recommended, but its continuing use is supported. © 2014 The British Psychological Society

    Young Schema Questionnaire – Short Form Version 3 (YSQ-S3): Preliminary validation in older adults

    Full text link
    © 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to establish the reliability and validity of one of the most used schema questionnaires, Young Schema Questionnaire Short Form Version 3 (YSQ-S3) in older adults. Method: 104 participants aged 60–84 years were recruited. They were administered a battery of questionnaires, including the YSQ-S3, Young-Atkinson Mode Inventory (YAMI), Germans (Personality) Screener, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and the Basic Psychological Needs Scale (BPNS). The YSQ-S3 was completed a second time by 83 participants a median of 12 days later. Results: Satisfactory internal consistency reliability was found for 13 of the 18 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) of the YSQ-S3. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for 17 of 18 EMS. Convergent validity was evident from significant correlations between the EMS of the YSQ-S3 and the vulnerable child and angry child schema modes from the YAMI. Congruent validity was evident from correlations of the majority of the EMS with the GDS, the GAI, German's (Personality) Screener and the BPNS measure. Conclusions: By and large the YSQ-S3 demonstrates internal and test re-test reliability in as well as congruent and convergent validity, in older adults. This suggests the YSQ-S3 may be of use in work establishing the utility of schema therapy in this population, and that schema therapy with older people warrants further exploration. Notwithstanding this some re-development of some EMS items appears to be required for the YSQ-S3 to be more relevant to older people

    Schema in older adults: does the schema mode model apply?

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: The relevance of schema theory to psychopathology, in particular personality disorder, in younger adults is established. Investigations into the relevance of schema theory to older adults, however, is highly limited. AIMS: To consider the relationship of schema modes to psychopathology in older adults and establish whether maladaptive schema modes are associated with unmet needs and that this relationship is mediated by the healthy adult mode of responding in this population. METHOD: One hundred and four older adults were recruited from an established database. Participants completed questionnaires assessing psychopathology, schema modes (YAMI: Young-Atkinson Mode Inventory) and basic psychological needs (BPNS: Basic Psychological Needs Scale - autonomy, competence and relatedness). Ninety-four responses were included after applying exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The healthy adult schema mode was found to be associated with reduced psychopathology, and maladaptive child modes (angry and vulnerable child) to increased psychopathology. The healthy adult schema mode mediated the relationship between maladaptive child modes and needs satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by schema theory, the presence of one of the maladaptive child modes makes it difficult for an older individual to have their needs met, but the presence of healthy adult mode works to support this process

    Learning safely from error: Reconsidering the ethics of simulation-based medical education through ethnography

    Get PDF
    ‘Human factors’ is an influential rationale in the UK national health service to understand mistakes, risk and safety. Although there have been studies examining its implications in workplaces, there has been little investigation of how it is taught, as a form of professional morality. This article draws on an observational study of human factors teaching in four hospital simulation centres in London, UK. Its main argument is that the teaching of human factors is realised through an identification and positive evaluation of ‘non-technical skills’ and the espousal of ‘non-judgemental’ pedagogy, both of which mean that mistakes cannot be made. Professional solidarity is then maintained on the absence of mistakes. We raise questions about the ethics of this teaching. The study is situated within a history of ethnographic accounts of medical mistakes, to explore the relationship between claims to professional knowledge and claims about failure

    Potential for children with intellectual disability to engage in cognitive behaviour therapy: the parent perspective.

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND:This study aimed to obtain the opinions of parents and carers of children with intellectual disability (ID) as to whether cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) could be useful for their children. METHODS:A mixed qualitative and quantitative method was employed. Twenty-one carers of children aged 10 to 17 having borderline to moderate intellectual functioning responded to an online questionnaire. Participants were provided with information about CBT and asked to respond to open-ended questions. Quantitative data pertained to questions about their child's ability to identify and describe thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Thematic analysis of responses was conducted using an inductive method of identifying themes from the qualitative data collected. RESULTS:Five themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Emotional Attunement (i.e. parent's understanding and recognition of their child's emotions), Role of the Therapist (i.e. ways therapists could facilitate the intervention), Role of the Parent (i.e. ways parents could engage in the therapy process), Anticipated Obstacles (i.e. what may get in the way of the therapy) and Suggested Adaptations for Therapy (i.e. how CBT can be adapted to suit the needs of children with ID). Seventy-six per cent agreed that their child would be able to engage in CBT with assistance. CONCLUSIONS:The majority of parents believed that CBT is an intervention that children with ID could engage in, provided the therapy is adapted, and the therapist accommodates their needs

    Engaging patients and clinicians through simulation: rebalancing the dynamics of care

    Get PDF
    This paper proposes simulation-based enactment of care as an innovative and fruitful means of engaging patients and clinicians to create collaborative solutions to healthcare issues. This use of simulation is a radical departure from traditional transmission models of education and training. Instead, we frame simulation as co-development, through which professionals, patients and publics share their equally (though differently) expert perspectives. The paper argues that a process of participatory design can bring about new insights and that simulation offers understandings that cannot easily be expressed in words. Drawing on more than a decade of our group’s research on simulation and engagement, the paper summarises findings from studies relating to clinician-patient collaboration and proposes a novel approach to address the current need. The paper outlines a mechanism whereby pathways of care are jointly created, shaped, tested and refined by professionals, patients, carers and others who are affected and concerned by clinical care
    corecore